SpendProofRequest fit

How one ad-budget decision becomes an evidence-bounded recommendation.

The review asks whether the agreed evidence supports one specific move. It is narrow by decision and broad enough by evidence—not a dashboard, broad audit, attribution rebuild, or promise of certainty.

DecisionEvidenceDistortionsEconomicsVerdict

The recommendation leads; the working remains inspectable.

  1. 01

    Decision

    Fix one scale, cut, hold, restart, or reallocation move, its owner, deadline, period, constraints, and cost of being wrong.

  2. 02

    Evidence

    Agree the smallest usable evidence set and include every commercial fact that could materially change the decision.

  3. 03

    Distortions

    Separate observed conflicts from possible explanations without inventing one true attribution number.

  4. 04

    Economics

    Test the move against margin, promotion, inventory, cash, seasonality, repeat-purchase, and operating context where material.

  5. 05

    Verdict

    Pair the conclusion with an action, guardrails, monitoring, stop conditions, and evidence that would change it.

Use the context that can change this decision—nothing more.

Store and channel

Net revenue, spend, platform claims, window definitions, and only the channels relevant to the move.

Unit economics

COGS, fulfilment, payment fees, discounts, contribution assumptions, and a plausible range rather than false precision.

Customer value

Repeat-purchase or subscription evidence when later value materially supports the move.

Operating reality

Inventory, cash, promotion, launch, seasonality, creative capacity, and team constraints only when decision-relevant.

Repeat-purchase boundary: When the decision relies materially on repeat purchases, subscriptions, or longer-term customer value, sufficient relevant evidence is required. New deep cohort construction is outside the founding review. If sufficient longer-term-value evidence does not already exist, the case is not accepted unless the decision is explicitly re-scoped so it no longer relies on that missing proof.

The decision at a glance, then the full reasoning.

1. One-page decision summary

  • Exact decision and verdict-action pair
  • Main reason and largest risk
  • What to do and not do
  • Monitoring rule and stop or reconsideration condition

2. Full written reasoning

  • Evidence register, assumptions, limits, and exclusions
  • Commercial implications and strongest counterargument
  • Guardrails and evidence that would change the conclusion
  • Three to five questions for the agency or internal team

Every verdict includes the action.

SupportedProceed within guardrails
UnsupportedDo not proceed as proposed
UnresolvedTest before committing

Unresolved is actionable only with the exact missing evidence, safe interim action, smallest useful test, monitoring and stop rules, review point, and evidence that would support or reject the larger move.

Claims the method will not make

  • That a platform is broken or one channel caused the entire discrepancy
  • A true per-channel ROAS that the evidence cannot establish
  • A revenue, profit, or campaign-performance guarantee
  • Independent human review unless a second human actually performs it

Start with fit. Send no evidence until the brief and transfer method are agreed.

Before fit is confirmed

Send only the brand, proposed move, and deadline. Do not send exports, screenshots, credentials, or customer data yet.

After brief acceptance

Use the agreed redacted screenshots or exports. No passwords or account access. Use redacted screenshots or exports; never send credentials or customer-level personal data.

Customer evidence is not reused for training, benchmarks, testimonials, recommendations, or public case studies without the relevant separate permission.

Every transition is recorded separately.

The accepted Decision Brief fixes the exact decision, period, constraints, evidence boundary, repeat-purchase requirement, exclusions, deliverable, verdict system, conformance boundary, delivery-clock start, price, payment timing, correction and waiver terms, and re-scoping rule. Decision Brief acceptance, evidence complete and usable, and owner case acceptance are separate events. Evidence must cover the same relevant period. A material scope change requires a new brief, explicit re-acceptance, and a new evidence-completeness confirmation.

Fit

A suitable decision normally affects approximately $10,000, approximately 15% of monthly paid-media spend, or has a similarly material effect on cash, inventory, a launch, or several weeks of activity. Routine daily optimisation is unsuitable. An optional 15–20-minute fit call covers suitability, context, scope, and evidence only. Email-only qualification remains available. No preliminary verdict is given.

Delivery

Review starts only after the latest brief, matching complete evidence, and separate owner case acceptance. QA and complete written delivery are recorded separately.

Handoff

An optional handoff call of up to 20 minutes may explain the written conclusion, assumptions, guardrails, and change conditions; it does not expand scope. It is optional and does not determine delivery completion.

Complete written delivery finishes the service. Invoice issue, due, overdue, payment, cure, waiver, refund, value review, permissions, and closure remain separate events. If payment remains unresolved, reminders may be sent on the due date, three business days later, and seven calendar days after the due date. Each reminder is separate and owner-controlled. No further work is performed while an unpaid invoice remains unresolved.

Inspect the fictional work before requesting fit.